Did pulps die a natural death or were they murdered to make room for something else? I don't know the answer, I just don't believe the explanation that's out there, i.e., that the War provided so many real horrors that the pulps just couldn't compete. If that were true how come noirs were so popular after the war? How come horror films were so popular after WWI?
Milt claims that humorous 50s rock (like the kind of thing The Coasters did) never died a natural death...it was killed by radio execs while it was still exhuberant and healthy. The public loved it. He says the radio people were so certain that funny music wouldn't last long that they decided to kill it off near the height of its popularity and phase in something new to replace it.
Could something like this have have happened to the pulps?
I find it hard to believe that magazines with this much appeal (above) could have slipped away so quickly.
Yikes! Getting sliced up by a giant paper cutter...how gruesome! Yet it must have sold well.
I wonder if the paperback revolution killed the pulps.
Maybe cheap sci-fi paperbacks replaced the pulp magazines. Maybe paperbacks were perceived to offer a whole novel for the same price as short stories in the pulps. Maybe...I wish I knew!
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Saturday, October 20, 2012
SOME INTERESTING WOMEN
An interesting model! I originally grafted her onto a picture of the mustard aisle at Walmart but I lost the background and had to do a trailer park instead.
Wow! I wish I had the equipment to take pictures like the one above. My guess is that it was taken with a double flash. You can get nice effects with other kinds of light but only flash gets that rich, oil painted look.
Above, nice light.
Here's (above) a nice contrast of textures and colors, with the interest centering on the pale, fleshy legs.
Wow! I wish I had the equipment to take pictures like the one above. My guess is that it was taken with a double flash. You can get nice effects with other kinds of light but only flash gets that rich, oil painted look.
Above, nice light.
Here's (above) a nice contrast of textures and colors, with the interest centering on the pale, fleshy legs.
Thursday, October 18, 2012
HALLOWEEN COSTUME IDEAS
I was trying to figure out what to wear on Halloween this year and it occurred to me that I should dress up as one of my own characters (above) from Theory Corner. The question is...which one?
The one I'm dying to do is The Mad Scientist (above). The problem is that I never completed his story because I couldn't find the right kind of lab coat. I'd need the long kind with a high collar and double rows of buttons going down the front. I don't see anything like that out there, so how can I dress up like him?
Here's (above) The Righteous Dude. I love this guy and dressing up like him would be easy. Ditto for the beatnik. The problem is that they're both too easy. A good costume takes risks, don't you think?
I could come as The Romance Reader, except...well, geez, that tight flannel nightgown would be hard to wear for a whole night. The one I have probably belonged to a skinny old lady who had a figure like Olive Oyl.
Or maybe The Smoker's bone-crushing adversary,"Beulah (above)." I picture her wearing The Romance Reader's flannel nightgown, only a huge, padded triple X version of it. Hmmmm....I'll have to see what the local thrift store has. It took me forever to find the skinny one the romance lady wears.
This (above) is a highly Photoshopped picture that I made for my sidebar. The nose is huge, the way John K used to draw it in caricatures. I could make a long nose and maybe attach it to glasses for stability. I might even be able to do a protruding skull in the back. I don't know if it would be comfortable to wear for a whole night, though.
Maybe The Lone Stranger!
Maybe I'll come as the Grand, Exalted, Imperial Muskrat of the Royal Order of the Muskrat. I'll tell you what...if anyone here lives in LA and makes a Muskrat costume of their own, send me a link to a picture of you in it and we'll have pizza together at Lido's (Dutch treat, of course). Wouldn't it be great to have group photos of all the local Muskrats doing justice to one of Lido's stringy pizzas?
I haven't posted about the muskrats in a while, so here's a reminder of what a meeting of that exalted order is like:
Of course members of the Royal Order of Raccoons Ladies' Auxiliary are invited too. To become a member you only have to show up wearing what refined middle-aged ladies of the 50s wore. Here's (below) a couple of links concerning the proper dress for both men and women.
For the ladies: http://uncleeddiestheorycorner.blogspot.com/2009/10/proper-attire-for-ladies-auxiliary.html
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
BACKSTREETS OF OLD LONDON
Old London bore little resemblance to the bland London of the present. Old London was a vibrant, creative, moody city with endless visual delights. It was also dank and mildewed, prone to crime and fire. That's okay...it was still more interesting than any modern city.
With buildings so close together fire was an ever present danger. The solution of the time was periodic wide boulevards which would act as a kind of fire break. Maybe that was a mistake. Boulevards are frequently awkward and unaesthetic wind traps. You have to have some but too many can deface the city they're trying to protect.
Maybe the city would have done better to regulate the kind of oil lamps that were used. Maybe banning candles and certain types of stoves and heaters might have been more helpful. Or maybe do the boulevard thing, but provide frequent walking bridges or tunnels.
Old London made good use of wrought iron. Iron and bricks (above) make a nice match, especially when the bricks and woodwork were painted black.
Old London was also full of balconies. That needs to be explained since London is a North European city and most Northern cities didn't feel the need for them. Maybe the balconies were a symbol for rooms to rent.
I love balconies, especially wooden ones (above) with wooden floors. Oh, to go back in a time machine and be a kid running around the corridors!
Some of the mid-size streets (above) were incredibly beautiful. If London had retained more of the best ones it could have attracted the kind of tourist dollars that Paris gets now.
And while I'm on the subject of Paris...what if Paris had followed the lead of the English and replaced their old town with a modern monstrosity (above) like the kind that Tati parodied in Playtime? Would anyone, even the Parisians, have had a desire to live there? Fortunately Paris kept the 19th Century part of the city and isolated the newer buildings in a modernist ghetto on the Right Bank.
You could wish they'd retained more of the Pre-Nineteenth Century architecture (above), but lets be grateful that they saved what they did.
********************
Thanks to Kellie Strom for the great link!
With buildings so close together fire was an ever present danger. The solution of the time was periodic wide boulevards which would act as a kind of fire break. Maybe that was a mistake. Boulevards are frequently awkward and unaesthetic wind traps. You have to have some but too many can deface the city they're trying to protect.
Maybe the city would have done better to regulate the kind of oil lamps that were used. Maybe banning candles and certain types of stoves and heaters might have been more helpful. Or maybe do the boulevard thing, but provide frequent walking bridges or tunnels.
Old London made good use of wrought iron. Iron and bricks (above) make a nice match, especially when the bricks and woodwork were painted black.
Old London was also full of balconies. That needs to be explained since London is a North European city and most Northern cities didn't feel the need for them. Maybe the balconies were a symbol for rooms to rent.
I love balconies, especially wooden ones (above) with wooden floors. Oh, to go back in a time machine and be a kid running around the corridors!
Some of the mid-size streets (above) were incredibly beautiful. If London had retained more of the best ones it could have attracted the kind of tourist dollars that Paris gets now.
And while I'm on the subject of Paris...what if Paris had followed the lead of the English and replaced their old town with a modern monstrosity (above) like the kind that Tati parodied in Playtime? Would anyone, even the Parisians, have had a desire to live there? Fortunately Paris kept the 19th Century part of the city and isolated the newer buildings in a modernist ghetto on the Right Bank.
You could wish they'd retained more of the Pre-Nineteenth Century architecture (above), but lets be grateful that they saved what they did.
********************
Thanks to Kellie Strom for the great link!
Labels:
architecture,
london,
old london,
vintage photos
Monday, October 15, 2012
HALLOWEEN MASKS AND PORCH SCULPTURES
What a great Halloween decoration this would make! I picture it as a giant lawn sculpture made up of plastic bags of lawn clippings and leaves with a blanket tongue and paper eyes. Hmmmm....maybe it should it should be surrounded by kid furniture, as if it were situated in a living room like it is in the picture. Maybe a man's legs should stick out of its mouth.
*Sigh!* The cheapest of all masks...the cereal box cutout type...and I see no current examples anywhere. Well, almost anywhere. John did those cardboard masks of Hanna and Barbera.
Good old Leg Avenue! This (above) is not only a good nurse costume, but it's a nice conversation starter on the subject of how hospital personnel should dress in the real world. We all know that men would recover faster if some of the nurses dressed like this.
I'll add that Leg Avenue still won't sell cardboard standups of their Halloween costume models. Anybody know why?
I might make something like this (above) for my front lawn. It depends how much the materials cost.
Above, a nice shot!
Boy, the mask (above) seems to expand out of the picture plane!
This (above) is, believe it or not, an African mask. At first glance it looks like something that would have come out of America in the 1920s, but when you look close at the details you see lots of sculptural and painting conventions of African origin. Maybe the artist was influenced by old American cartoons he saw. Maybe he arrived at this caricature style independently.
Saturday, October 13, 2012
MILT TALKS ABOUT 3D TV
INT. BURGER RESTAURANT:
MILT: "Okay, I gotta clear the table so I can tell you about the big thing that's coming up...."
EDDIE (VO): "Big thing?
MILT: "Yeah! My family and I are soon to become owners of...are you ready for this?...a (Ahem!)...55' Samsung 3D TV! There's a clearance sale on and I can get it for a thousand bucks. That's a set that normally sells for three grand or more."
EDDIE (VO): "A 3D TV!!??? Woooow! That's great!!!!! Invite me over! But how come it's so cheap? Samsung's a big brand."
MILT: "Ahhh, good question! The answer is that Samsung is debuting a new set called the 'Smart TV' that doesn't use a remote. It responds to hand commands. You change the settings from your chair just by wiggling your hands."
EDDIE (VO): "Yikes! That's great...but it's not worth an extra two thousand bucks."
MILT: "Exactly! When I first heard about the Smart TV I thought, 'Oh, no! Another excuse to charge an arm and a leg for a TV!' Then I thought, 'Wait a minute! What are they gonna do with the old sets?' A friend called and told me about the sale and that clinched it. "
MILT: "Eddie, have you ever seen 3D on TV?"
EDDIE (VO): "Yeah, a while back in Best Buy, but the glasses were kinda clunky."
MILT: "Not any more. These glasses are low profile. Wearing them is like wearing Ray Bans...well, er...sort of. Anyway, they're only a small distraction. You just have to hold them close up to the set to activate them. The glasses are free, and so is the Blue Ray player. The store throws them in for the price of the set!"
EDDIE (VO): "You don't hear so much about 3D TV these days. Maybe the sets didn't sell as well as expected."
MILT: "Yeah, it's hard to know if the industry will continue to support it. I think it will, but who knows? Maybe the prices are too high. I bet they'd sell a lot more TVs if the price was lower. Anyway, I'm happy because the price is a steal even without the 3D.
Oh, and I forgot to say that the set I want to get is made in Korea. My friend says you have to avoid stores like Frye's because their sets are likely made in China where the standards are lower."
EDDIE (VO): "Hey Milt, do you mind if I put this on Theory Corner? Maybe somebody else'll save a buck on a set, just like you will."
MILT: "Sure, go ahead! If enough people buy 3D TVs, then it'll become standard!"
Friday, October 12, 2012
ATLAS SHRUGGED II DEBUTS TODAY!
Yikes! "Atlas Shrugged II" debuts today and I almost forgot about it! This is the kind of film I have to see on the first day, so if you feel the same way, then maybe I'll see you in the theater!
What will it be like? Er....Maybe not technically great. Atlas Part 1 (shown in the clip above) had terrific actors in the main roles but had to chintz on everything else. Atlas is an epic book and the filmmakers just didn't have the money to shoot an epic film. Even so, the effort was much appreciated by fans.
I'm expecting this second film to have more problems than the first, but I'm also expecting to have the pleasure of seeing capitalism defended on the screen. When's the last time you saw that? The last film I can think of that did that (apart from other Rand films) was a black and white Walter Houston/Mary Astor film called "Dodsworth." Look for it on TCM. I think you'll like it.
Anyway, here's (below) where the film is playing in the Los Angeles area. 'Better confirm the times and days on the net or by phone because Atlas may not start the same day in every theater.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)