Saturday, September 15, 2007

LOOKING AT ARTIST/MODEL PAINTINGS

I've always liked artist and model pictures. When they're done right they're strangely soothing and appealing and...classic, for lack of a better word. Even when they contain major perspective flaws like this one (above), where the painter seems to be a dwarf and the model a giant, they're still fun to look at. Maybe artists like them because they remind us of hours of pleasant concentration.



I used to think the main selling point was the sex, where a beautiful girl lets you paint her for hours on end. There's something interesting about turning sex into art. But that can't be all. Look at the photo above. It's got a naked girl, an artist and a faux Vermeer setting...and it doesn't work on any level. What's missing?
You can make a great picture (above) even when the model has her clothes on, but naked is better. Nudity is always a profound and shocking revelation.


Artist/model pictures seem to work best in soupy colors like yellow, brown, olive green, black,and white (above), or in warm grays and browns like the draped model picture above that. I wonder why that is? Somehow the 19th century managed to put a lock on this kind of subject matter.

By the way, I think this figure with its back turned to us (above) is a guy.


Here's another perspective problem (above) where giant men appear to be painting a tiny woman. Once again we forgive the flaw. The picture is terrific but, just to nitpick, the bold treatment of the men in the foreground seems to undermine the serenity you're supposed to feel in a classic artist/model picture. You're not supposed to be admiring the detail.


This picture (above) isn't by Eakins but it reminds me of his stark, anatomical style. This is a wonderful picture but once again, the boldness undermines the tranquility you're supposed to see in studies of this kind.
In my opinion, artist/model pictures always seem to work best when they feel like a study, something the artist dashed off in two or three days. Maybe that's because quick studies are good at capturing the immediacy and starkness of the naked skin.


This picture (above) is off-topic since there's no artist in it, but I include it anyway. It's an interesting idea to have a woman pose in a tight skirt, bathed in subdued, white light.






16 comments:

Anonymous said...

The faux Vermeer one just looks so uptight, you can't believe any work is going on. The painter looks like he'd be afraid to mess up his clothes, or the pretty floor. The cat is good, though.

Here's mine, also with cats.

Benjamin De Schrijver said...

How does it have anything to do with sex? It never has for me. For me it's about either beauty or simply study.

Interesting post though... there's definitly something to paintings like this.

Nico said...

EDDIE! Sorry this doesn't have much to do with model paintings, but I just had to stop in and say how INCREDIBLE it was meeting you the other night, though it was much too short! Being in a room filled with my heroes was a bit of a trip. You're the nicest guy on the planet, on top of a LIVING cartoon character! Thanks so much for wanting to check out our "Happy Hour" videos, too.

I'll be back in early November, and i can't wait to see you all again!!

your biggest fan
Nico!!!!!

Eddie Fitzgerald said...

Kellie: Nice drawing! And nice book too!

Nico: It was nice meeting you too! I recognized you from caricatures on Marlo and Kali's sites, and from your photo on comments you wrote here.

Jenny Lerew said...

hah--love this post, Eddie! Great stuff! Just for the fun of it I'll whip up an argument:

Obviously there's an inescapable aspect of sexuality wherever there's nudity, but I don't believe that that was the aim of these pictures at all. The setup of "artist and model" goes back to Galatea and Pygmalion; while that myth involves love--the artist falling in love with and marrying his creation--there's all kinds of things going on there that aren't all about the sex act at all, but more about a love of beauty--whatever that other greek word is for love, the one that isn't "eros".

And the painting of artist studying model is much more akin to the self-portrait subject in art than it is to pornography; after all, the artists had to see the figure unclothed to see the figure, period, not to get turned on. Especially in a classroom setting. The sexualization of the nude is really a modern thing, anyway, isn't it? We're more prudish now than we were 150 years ago(and definitely moe than 250 years ago)! People then by necessity led earthier lives: men could piss in the street in the 1700s-1800s and while it was vulgar to do so, a policceman wasn't going to haul them off to jail while a kid and his mama nearby screamed "LOOK! ye gods!! a PENIS!" etc.

Oops--gotta run. Well, that's it for now! : )

Dooley said...

Off topic, but it's a shame we missed you at the Coral Cafe Thursday night. John mentioned that you were from Philly, and there were four of us South Eastern Pennsylvanians there. Oh well, we'll be back at some point early next year.

Did you guys end up going to the Basil Wolverton exhibit on Saturday?

Shawn Dickinson said...

I agree with Nico...It was a blast hanging out with you and Mike the other night, and laughing at the TV! I'm a big fan of EVERY person who was there! Hopefully we can hang out again soon!

Your other biggest fan,
Shawn

p.s. Hope you liked that pizza..it was from Lido's..the best pizza ever!

Jenny Lerew said...

Heap big animation shindig, eh? ; )

Eddie Fitzgerald said...

Jenny: Men are dominated by hormones, what can I say? Even so, I admit that once I start painting another side of me kicks in. I wish I'd been able to do a better job at articulating why painting models is so interesting.

In my case almost everything I do for pleasure feeds into my professional life somehow. I can't even listen to music without thinking how it would sound in a film and trying to analyse it. Even figure drawing is tied to what I do for a living. It's fun but I'm still working when I do it.

Figure painting is different. I'm not likely to be a figure painter so what I paint is for the sheer fun and challenge.

Artists really do know something about the world that ordinary people don't. I don't think we sustain that knowledge all day long, but when we're sitting there with something to paint and colors in hand, we're kings.

We look at something closely and most other people don't. We try to figure it out on lots of technical and emotional levels at the same time. We actually see it!

Shawn: It was good meeting you too!

Sean: Yep! We saw the Wolverton exhibit on Saturday! I'll write about it soon!

Eddie Fitzgerald said...

Jenny: You should have come!

Anonymous said...

Thanks Eddie, compliments from a man of such taste are highly treasured!

Jenny Lerew said...

Eddie: but I'm not on the list. Mike's given up on me. presumably. ; D
I'd like to see pictures of that gathering! Did you draw too or just chat?

Eddie Fitzgerald said...

Jennie: No drawing, just talk abour drawing.

Dooley said...

Rats! Our crew missed you guys at the Wolverton show too. Amazing exhibit, though.

Was the enourmous Mexican fair/carnival still going on when you guys went? That was an adventure unto itself!

Taber said...

I was able to go to the Ghetty recently (in LA for non-californians), and I was surprised to find far less classical anatomy studies and nude drawings than I had hoped for. Most of the paintings seems so stodgy to me that I felt little more desire to look at them than I had to look at the other patrons.

Fortunately they had some very interesting sculptures dotted about the place, which was enough to keep me happy while my companion examined the paintings and photographs.

jeanloui said...

If you like "Artist and model" paintings, I have a set in Flickr:

Flickr

with more than 1500 pictures,

By the way, can you remember the authors of the "artist and model" paintings you posted in this blog?

Thanks a lot

jeanloui
imagicweb[at]gmail.com