Friday, August 28, 2015

MORE ASTRONOMY PICS 8/2015

This is Puppis A, a supernova remnant seen through a gap in a large foreground nebula, the Vela Super Nova Remnant. If you're a longtime reader of the astronomy posts here then you probably realize that this is not the way nova remnants are supposed to look.

Look how fragmented the red clouds are, as if they were torn to pieces by an angry giant. Not only that but the blue pieces of the cloud are long and fibrous, and the pieces are parallel...not the shape you'd expect in a conventional explosion. One of the red clouds on the right has a corkscrew shape. So what gives here? I don't know. 

Do you suppose there was one big explosion then ejected fragments blew up in secondary explosions the way some fireworks do? I'm probably wrong. 


For context, here's a much wider shot of the foreground cloud we were peeking through in the topmost photo. Look at the number of stars in the background. This is somewhere in the star-dense middle region of the galaxy. Stars are born and die quickly there.

It's a violent place with (I'm guessing) cumulative solar winds of an intensity that's hard to imagine. Maybe we should be surprised when any remnants have a normal shape in a rough neighborhood like this one.


Back in our neighborhood, here's (above) the familiar Crab Nebula, looking better than you've ever seen it before. The star that created it went nova in 1054 AD. When I was a kid a local science museum sold black and white glossies of this object and I bought one. It looked like a simple doughnut with slightly fuzzy edges and a star in the middle. Now,   with aid of the Hubble, it looks like an explosion in a cat fur warehouse.

The rapidly enlarging cloud is now 10 light years across.


Above, a color enhanced Pluto as seen by the New Horizons spacecraft in July. The probe is now headed for an asteroid in the Keiper Belt. It's a billion miles more remote than Pluto.



2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I can never understand what I'm looking at in these photos. They seem abstract, and that frustrates me.

I appreciate the cosmic viewpoint of these photos but paradoxically I need to find a way to relate to them.

Eddie Fitzgerald said...

Anon: Haw! I sympathize. A photo should be interesting all by itself and text should simply elaborate. I'll try to be more careful when I select these things. There is one exception, though.

Occassionally a photo looks normal and on closer examination is anything but. That brings out the Sherlock Holmes in me. The first photo of the red fragments struck me that way. You'e right about a couple of the other pictures, though. Thanks for the criticism!