THE IDEAL WOMAN

There's a subject we've never discussed on Uncle Eddie's Theory Corner, and it's time to do that now. I speak of the Ideal Woman, the woman that all men dream about and who all women aspire to be.   

Notice I didn't say, "The Perfect Woman." No, no. The Ideal Woman isn't perfect. Nobody is. Expect her to be a tad moody sometimes.

And her friends might be a bit...oh, a bit on the "wild side."

Maybe some of them are a bit generous with their phone numbers. That's okay.

The woman I'm talking about cultivates an inner life that insulates her against the temptations of the  world. 

Her mind is on things like...science.

Of course the Ideal Woman has certain physical assets.

Cultural assets, too. She's always up on what the cutting-edge poets are doing.

And Earthy. She's very Earthy. The needs of the flesh are no stranger to her. 

The Ideal Woman isn't a slave to the fashion du jour.  

She chuckles at the fashion follies of lesser women.

No, the Ideal Woman embodies principals that are timeless. She's a thing of beauty that transcends attribution or description.

There she goes, a basket of wild flowers in her hands, leading the rest of us mortals to the bright and sunny uplands.

A CONTEMPORARY LIVING ROOM

I love the updated craftsman-type houses (above) that are popular now. They're pricey, though. All that wood and stone...the irregular room shapes, the architect's fee...they don't come cheap. Fortunately a number of neo-craftsman innovations have been incorporated into other more affordable styles, and I thought I'd discuss that here. 

For comparison here's the home of a friend. The house has a good vibe and my friend and his wife like living there. I see Mediterranean, craftsman, ranch and post-modern influences. I even see a little Cliff May and Frank Lloyd Wright.

The two posts are Craftsman. The ultra wide living room entrance/central corridor is Cliff May and the vestibule area is post-modern. I don't know who invented the sunken living room but I'll attribute it to Wright because he introduced so many similar ideas.

This view (above) is from the front door area looking into the central corridor. To the left we see a hint of the dining room and to the right we get a glimpse of the kitchen.

The pillars look like an obstacle in the photo but that's because I didn't photograph them well. In reality they come off as playful and even sheltering.

The very latest house theories would have the kitchen entrance at the end of the corridor rather than off to the right, but the right access is a nice counterpoint to the rest of the house so it works for me.

The dining room (above) is raised above the sunken living room and that works just fine. The steps look like something you'd trip over but I'd be surprised if anyone ever did. The raised floor lends importance and a sense of fun to the dining room and the abundant daylight makes it very inviting.

I'll bet lots of people sit on the steps during house parties.

I only have room for one more photo, so I'll put up this one, showing the door and darkened vestibule area. This probably suits my friend who has to stare into a brilliant computer screen all day, and no doubt welcomes a little rest for the eyes. Me, I don't have that problem right now so I'd opt for more light.

I'd put translucent glass panels all around the door. The light would bounce off the nearby walls as if they were additional light fixtures, and probably unpredictable mood lighting would result. Of course the neighbors would think I was crazy for undoing something that worked fine at the start.

SEPTEMBER ASTRONOMY PICTURES

Here's a composite view of Pluto taken by the New Horizons probe on July 14th. Most of the closeup pictures taken then are still stored on the spacecraft and are only now being sent back slowly.

Above, a detail of Pluto's surface. The smallest details are maybe a kilometer and a half wide.

Above, a solar prominence. Thanks to the old Voyager spacecraft which is now in deep space between us and Alpha Centauri we now know what happens to these ejections when they leave the Solar System.

The ejecta that faces the center of the galaxy is stopped when it collides with intense radiation coming our way from other stars. The interface consists of a crescent-shaped cloud of magnetic bubbles. It's speculated that this cloud shields the Solar System from lethal radiation emanating from the galactic center.

A study of the surface of Saturn's moon Enceladus now reveals that the plates of ice in this hemisphere are all moving in the same direction, something which reinforces the case for global underground seas.

NASA's going to announce a major finding about Mars on Monday, but they're keeping their cards close to the vest until then. The news media is speculating that it might have something to do with water being discovered on that planet; not billion year-old dry river beds but fresh, currently existing water. Actually, if it's there it's probably just enough to temporarily wet the ground in a few places...but that certainly qualifies as news.

On the other hand...you don't think they found evidence of old life, do you? Naw...that would be too good to be true.

[Update, Tuesday: Yep! It was water, and water only. Seasonal changes in the water patterns on hills confirm its existence. The water doesn't last long, though. It evaporates on its way down the slopes. A chemical in the soil allows the water to stay liquid for a time, even in the cold Martian air.]

[Another Update 10/8/2015: Small pockets of liquid water have been found on Pluto! Most likely it came up to the surface from an underground source, indicating internal heat within the planetoid.]

EUROPEAN HALLOWEEN

 Where did Halloween come from?  According to Halloween sites on the net, the version that Americans and Canadians celebrate is influenced largely by Celtic traditions, especially those from Ireland and Scotland, and from the North European tradition of Walpurgis, which is celebrated on the last day of April.

Germans who live near the Harz Mountins celebrate the holiday by making a trek up to the "Brocken," a mountain (above) reputed to be a favorite meeting place of witches.

Those who don't want to hike can take a train.

Lots of girls come dressed as witches.

Come nightfall big bonfires are lit and, I assume, alcohol is consumed in vast quantities.

Somewhere in Germany is Walpurgis Castle (above). I have no idea what goes on there.

Boy, there's no lack of Walpurgis artwork on the internet!

Is this (above) a depiction of Walpugis? I can't tell.

HALLOWEEN 2015!

It's Halloween season again and my first task for the holiday is always to search the Halloween sites for old-time die-cut window decorations. I had a collection of them even when I was a kid. That's because they were cheap and sold for a price that even little kids like me could afford.

The pearls of greatest price were the ones that were holdovers from a much older period, maybe the 1910s and 20s. They seemed to come from a time when people actually believed in witches and ghosts.

It's as if the people back then used humor to ease the anxiety they felt about a holiday which threatened to unleash real supernatural weirdness on the world.

Some of the best cardboard masks were done by artists (above) who weren't the best draughtsmen, but who had a visceral feel for the holiday. I wonder how they made a living the rest of the year? 

Halloween decorations also made me aware that there were different kinds of artists in the world. Some were what we would call "graphic artists" today. Content for them was less important than pleasing composition.

There was a real pagan influence in the Halloween cards (above) of this period. It was as if the Druids had never died out.

Yikes! Talk about supernatural weirdness.....

THE OTHER BEATRIX POTTER

Whenever I show this picture to artist friends they invariably respond with something like "I know who did that...it was Beatrix Potter, right?" Wrong. The artist was Jill Barklem, who deserves to be better known.

Barklem did most of her work (above) in the 1990s, I think. She's not as well known in America as in the UK. I'm guessing that her publisher didn't promote her enough, but that's just a guess.

For comparison, here's (above) a picture by Beatrix Potter. Potter emphasized line quality and a gritty watercolor texture. Barklem was more architectural.

Big, natural wood cabinets like the kind Barklem liked to draw were common in the 1990s but are scarce now. Seeing this reminds me that for a decade or so romantic English country-style was in and sentimental cottage artists like Thomas Kinkade were popular. All that disappeared, seemingly overnight. Maybe if Barklem had continued to paint, that movement would have lasted longer.

The artist's real-life desk was full of thorns and brambles. She worked in pencil from photocopies of her rough layouts then inked leafy details derived from the samples that were in front of her.

Above, an example.

She liked drawing fine detail (above) and that was her undoing. She had an eye problem that was mostly resolved by surgery but which made rendering difficult. She abandoned children's books and did doll houses and miniature sculptures instead.

Interesting, eh?

GEPPETO'S WORKSHOP

Sometimes I wonder if Gustaf Tenggren was indirectly responsible for Disneyland. His paintings of Geppeto's workshop were so appealing and so real that they must have created a desire in the viewer to walk into the shop and examine the toys close up.

This is Tenggren at the peak of his powers, when he was at his most inventive and charismatic. I wish you could buy reproductions of these toys at Disneyland.

For comparison here's (above and below) backgrounds from the same film by (I think) Claude Coats, who's no slouch himself. They're great but I wouldn't say they fill the viewer with a desire to walk into the painting and look around.

A painter as good as Coates (above) would normally dominate a project like this but Tenggren wipes the floor with him.

Who painted this one? The clock designs are specific and real like Tenggren's but are a tad generic like Coates'. Maybe the two artists collaborated. Notice the Horvath-type detail on the clock at the lower left. I'll return to this in a moment.

Here's the Geppeto's workshop from the ride at Disneyland. Some of the toys have a Tenggren influence and some seem disconcertingly generic.

The dolls seem oddly spaced at first glance, but the passenger car goes through this pretty quickly and you could argue that they wouldn't read if they were more densely packed. Even so....

I don't see many of the unique clocks that are in the film.

Apparently some earlier attempts were made at reproducing some of the clocks and toys in the film.  Seeing this photo (above) makes me appreciate how difficult that job must have been. The sculptures contain some nice elements but don't capture the flamboyance of the original artwork.

There's that clock again (above). Why did the artist delete the Horvath-style bottom?