Tuesday, October 23, 2007
THE RETURN OF THE PHILOSOPHY GIRLS
Monday, October 22, 2007
TWO VERSIONS OF "TELL HIM"
Here's (above)one of my all-time favorite music videos, the Exciters singing "Tell Him." Assuming that I'm right, and this is as good as I think it is, then what makes it so good?
Well, of course Brenda Reid had a great voice and the song and arrangement was perfect. Reid had soul, no doubt about it, and she sings with utter sincerity. Maybe she had a background in gospel.
When you have a song this bouncy it must be tempting to play it 100% as a dance song as this singer (above) did on American Idol. She does a nice job but she comes off as shallow. Reid makes us feel the point of the song at the same time she plays it for entertainment. In her version the rhythm reinforces the point.
The song is about how colossal and majestic love is. When you have it, drop everything and embrace it because nothing else is more important. That's a powerful statement. You can't convincingly make that point with a second-rate song.
And such a song has to be something that makes people tap their feet, something that's social and reminds people how much they need other people, how much they delight in being with other people. The song warns us that our kind of creature can't be happy unless we give ourselves up to overpowering emotions like love and lust.
Actually, I've always thought of animation this way. You need a central assumption to tell a good cartoon story. Maybe the assumption is something as simple as "It's great to be alive!" If that's what you want to convey then you can't do it with a second-rate story or second-rate cartooning. It has to be the best you can do, otherwise the medium is fighting the message.
Saturday, October 20, 2007
A SPUMCO ARTIST HITS THE BIG TIME
A couple of days ago I watched Tarantino's "Grindhouse" on disc and nearly fell out of my chair when the end credits came up. The song over the credits was "Chick Habit" by April March! April was a layout artist on the second season of Ren & Stimpy! Check out this YouTube version of the song (above).
We all thought April had talent but most of us weren't familiar with the French Yay-Yay (spelled right?) style that she worked in. Now I feel stupid for not having paid more attention. I'm really happy for her. Here's (above) a video of another of her songs, "Mignonette."
Here's a fan favorite (above): "Cet Air-La."
I assume everyone here is familiar with the Yay Yay style, but in case you're not here's (above) a sample by Sylvie Vartan.
Friday, October 19, 2007
MOST PAINTERS DON'T USE ENOUGH DARKS

Thanks to a link on Michael Sporn's site I discovered a terrific blog devoted entirely to animation backgrounds.
Michael's blog: http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/
Rob Richard's background blog: http://animationbackgrounds.blogspot.com/
The one at the top (above) is one of my favorites, maybe from "Saludos Amigos." Man, I'd give a lot to own that! One of these days I'll copy it just to see what I can learn from it! I've learned something already, namely the primal graphic appeal of the dog penis (the red-tipped mountain on the upper right).

Looking at the Disney backgrounds I'm struck by how often the artists used very dark colors. I envy audiences who saw these films in technicolor. Technicolor reproduced rich, saturated darks without losing the details.

Here the darks aren't just an an accent, they completely dominate the picture. In spite of that, the picture comes off as colorful. I'll bet characters read beautifully on top of this. I'm guessing that this is inspired by Mary Blair, who in turn might have been inspired by 17th century Dutch flower paintings.
Rob provides us with a picture (above) for comparison.
Even Pinocchio BGs (above) had lots of darks.
TVs used to be bad at reproducing darks. Maybe the Trinitron was the first to do it successfully. A whole generation of artists saw films like Alice only on inferior TV monitors and probably couldn't understand why the backgrounds were so well-regarded.



Sometimes Disney took the dark thing too far, as with this downshot of Goofy's home (above). The garish orange house looks like it was pickled in formaldehyde. The darks seem menacing and inappropriate to the subject. Even so, it's an interesting experiment.
LOOK THE PART

It occurred to me as I was leaving the building, feeling dejected and sorry for myself, that I might have done a lot better if I had just looked the part. Directors wear baseball caps and jeans...or, in another era, riding pants and a crop. I was just too "against type."
You can't blame executives for having stereotypes in mind. We all do. If you were hiring an accountant, which man would you pick: the man with the glasses halfway down his nose like the guy pictured above...


When you think about it, stereotypes convey a lot of useful information. When someone on the street says, "You work in animation? Wow! You must have a terrific imagination!", they're conveying something important. They're telling you that they value and even crave imagination and are willing to dish out money for media that delivers it.
I've often thought that we should be the industry the public wants us to be. They imagine that an animation studio is a wonderland full of wild, zany, talented visionaries...and that's exactly what it should be.
Most professions would do well to live up to the image the public has of them. Rock musicians should be wild, talented guys surrounded by groupies and young writers should peck out great novels under a 25 watt bulb in ratty Manhattan apartments. Engineers should be bright and earnest and poets should be temperamental and wear velvet suits. We all should strive to be what the public wants us to be, what gives people pleasure to think about.
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
COMPUTER CARICATURES VS. HAND-DRAWN
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
YOU WOULDN'T WANT TO BE SUPERMAN!










All these pictures were stolen from a terrific site: http://www.superdickery.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)