I don't take drugs but I see documentaries about it. Like everybody else I wonder why addicts do it. After all, they've heard the same horror stories that I have. Why trade a short-term high for long-term misery? My guess is that most addicts don't expect to be around for the long term...they're depressives who do it as a prelude to suicide.
'Just a guess.
I'm also guessing that some addicts are romantics at heart. They reason that if they're going to check out then they'd like to have a few experiences first. It's the poor man's equivalent of a final vacation. They figure they'll take the inner journey. They want to find out if the hippies and mystics were on to something. Before they cash in the chips they want to take that lateral step outside of the ordinary world and see how things look from there.
I don't know what it's like to do that, but here's my best guess based...I admit...only on books and movies.
At the outset of the high the world is endlessly fascinating. It's full of lights and sounds and frenetic activity. You hear the clatter of heels on the sidewalk, the hum of neon. You become aware of the city's beating heart, expanding and contracting with the passing El trains.
You notice little things that you never noticed before before, like how there's a whole world in a street puddle (above).
Commonplace objects (above) look weird and funny, and you want to laugh.
After a while though, the drug begins to wear off and the streets (above) become less and less friendly. You become more aware of people who are off kilter somehow. They stare. They walk in and out of shadows. They seem to know something you don't.
Rooms seem frighteningly empty. It's an emptiness that has weight, that's full of menace, that's somehow palpably alive.
Whatever room you're in, you take note of where the exits are. It's not a case of being afraid of a police raid, or of violent friends. There's a sense that somehow the room itself might turn against you.
Out on the street you panic. For someone like you there's no food, no job, no real friends, no money of your own.
And that's how you end up walking next to an intended victim on a dark street, waiting for the right moment to strike. Maybe the guy has a family who depends on him. It doesn't matter. The guy has money and you want it, it's as simple as that.
It's interesting that the drug odyssey that began as a last fling before suicide didn't turn out that way. My guess is that addicts are among the least suicidal people you'll ever meet. They don't start out that way, just the opposite, but somewhere along the line they change. No more inner journey, no more romantic farewell to life. Something about the drug supercharges the will to live, no matter how painful and no matter how degraded that life might be.
Interesting, eh?
11 comments:
Great ideas and a fascinating post. Thanks Eddie!
I'm mindblown. That's really all I have to say. I'd go as far as to say that this is probably one of your best posts this year.
Sean, Roberto: Thanks. Since you liked it I'll assume that you didn't watch it on a phone or a tablet. Atmospheric pictures don't play as well on mobile devices.
You got it Eddie - nice big screen at home for your posts.
Nice conjecturing Eddie, using your Instant Armchair Surmise-o-Scope ™ (patent pending, all rights reserved). Actual professional opinions from medical experts about narcotic hallucination are overrated, anyway.
BTW, the 4th scan with Hans Conried is from a goofy 1953 comedy called THE TWONKY, about a hypnotic, anthropomorphic TV set.
Mike: Haw! Well, I just assume that all people, or at least most, have a philosophical side. Man is a thinking creature.
I have no romantic notions about drugs. I do know that for some they were a gateway to spiritual awakening, perhaps an artificial one, but one that changed their world view. I know some animals eat fermented fruits and hallucinogenic plants and I wonder what motivated them to do such things? Perhaps there is a need to reconnect to a higher power that some find in religion and others look for in drugs?
Your books and movies misled you.
Anon: Fascinating! Maybe they did. If you have time tell me where I went wrong.
eddie, I will say this...your books and movies did not necessarily mislead you but allowed you to conjure a spot on caricature. befitting of this blog. I just found it inconsistent how you jumped around from hippy trips (hallucinogens) to full blown junkie (narcotics)--that's all.
Anon: Many thanks. It occurred to me that I might be mixing up two kinds of drugs highs, which may have different effects. When you blog as frequently as I do there's no time to thoroughly research things. I have to rely on readers who have some personal knowledge to spot the errors.
When I decide to post anyway, regardless of uncertainty, it's because I feel that a larger and uncommonly heard truth, is embodied in the post. In this case I'm considering the addict as a thinking person whose flawed personal philosophy leads him to make bad choices. It's not the way addicts are commonly considered. For me that point of view is the real value of the post.
Anyway, thanks for the comment!
Post a Comment