Saturday, February 19, 2011

SCHIAPARELLI

I admit that I don't know much about the fashion world, but a couple of weeks ago I thumbed through a giant book (above) about designer Elsa Schiaparelli, and I'm glad I did. She was one of the makers of the modern world.






Her first Parisian designs were heavily influenced by Surrealism. She had a great sense of humor. What do you think of the fur shoes (above), or the hat (also above) that deliberately looked like an upside-down shoe?


After a time she set up a second studio in Britain,  to be close to the wool manufacturers. They were experimenting with all sorts of new weaves and she wanted to be the first to see if anything interesting could be done with them. Seeing that a famous designer had set up shop right across the street, the mill people went out of their way to come up with new fabrics for her. It's a case of art and industry combining for mutual benefit.



She designed funny, over-the-top clothing all her life, but the designs which most interest me (above) are the minimalist, almost military designs she did in the thirties and forties.


She was going for simple shapes that emphasized quality fabrics and careful cutting. I imagine that Calvin Klein must have been influenced by Schiaparelli, only he took the additional step of making this kind of elegance available for a price that most working women could afford.

[Let me digress for a moment to defend Klein against his many detractors. Like a lot of people I was dismayed when Klein turned jeans into a high fashion item. It seemed to defeat the whole purpose of jeans, which was to break down class barriers and promote a youthful, adventurous approach to life. What I failed to realize was that tastes change and jeans were doomed to drop out of sight anyway. By adding design to them Klein gave them decades of additional life on the shelves...and they still functioned as class levelers. No small achievement, that. Klein was a hero.]


Over time Schiaparelli developed "The Knack." It seemed that everything she touched, even scarves (above), were characterized by simplicity and elegance.



I don't think Schiaparelli designed this (above), but it owes a lot to her sense of fun and surrealism. Lots of things we take for granted now began, at least in part, in Shiaparelli's head. One writer credits her with the idea of the fashion show, with it's combination of runway, art, music and long, skinny women. Man, some people just write their names on an entire age!

Thursday, February 17, 2011

I'M READING "THE GIRLS OF MURDER CITY"

It's a terrific book, and it makes a lot of interesting points. I was surprised to see how much 1924 resembled 1964. It's as if the revolutionary 1960s actually began in Chicago in the 1920s.  Those were strange times. Disillusioned veterans of WW1 roamed the streets. Radio was getting big. Following a century of unprecedented growth, the country was rich, and increasingly urban. A lot of men were clerks, not laborers. Change was in the air. 


The drug of choice was alcohol (above), only it was illegal! People drank a lot of fake liquor made of anything the bootleggers could get hold of. Bad liquor addled brains. People did crazy things. 


Jazz (above) was their rock n' roll, the faster the better. Records made it possible to listen to it at home.


Girls in particular picked up on the new sensibility. All over the Midwest girls were aching to get to Chicago so they could lead "The Life." That city was to them what San Francisco was to the hippies 40 years later. 


Girls made it their business to get to know men with cars. They saw cars as futuristic machines that could whisk them away from suffocating small towns...


...to the giant metropolis of Chicago (above), and the big jazz clubs!


For small town girls the big city was liberating, no doubt about it.  The problem is, it was also decadent...and dangerous.

A girl (above) needed a protector.



Some of the girls (above) carried guns. They had to. The violent crime rate among women soared.


Some girls (above) flocked to men they thought were gangsters. Some of the gangsters were reputed to be gentlemen of a sort. Some women considered their men's murders to be funny. It was a weird time. Morality was considered old fashioned in some circles.


Where was all this going? We'll never know because The Great Depression and WWII intervened. But the social upheaval that began in Chicago wasn't exactly canceled...it was just postponed. We'd see it again in San Francisco in the 1960s. Interesting, huh?

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

MALE FACES TO DRAW


I'm really busy, so I hope you won't be offended if I put up something quick and dirty from my file of favorite faces. These are all good subjects to draw, I just don't have the time to comment on them adequately.

I'll start with Victor Mature (above). Now THERE'S a face! A vertical brow (most men have diagonal brows), ears that stick out at the bottom, deep-set eyes with heavy, dramatic lids, big lips, masculine jaw...it's an interesting  combination of features.


Here's (above) Richard Widmark.... Aaaargh! Time restraints force me to post him without comment!


















One of these days I'll have to do a post about Chaplin's partner, Eric Campbell (above). In the Mutuals shorts Chaplin and Campbell are a team. When Campbell died in an auto accident, Chaplin had to stop making funny shorts. His slapstick style depended heavily on Campbell as a foil, and it just wasn't possible to continue further down that road without him.



Campbell (above, without make-up) was a real pro with long stage experience in the same innovative group that the young Chaplin belonged to. 






Here's (above) proof that Wally Wood-type people actually exist. This man even looks like Wally Wood!


Monday, February 14, 2011

VICTORIAN VALENTINES YOU HAVEN'T SEEN

Contemporary valentine cards (sample above) can get pretty nasty, but they don't compare in ferocity to Victorian cards. The Victorians were brutal!

So you thought those cards were all cherubs and swans. Well, think again!!! 


Here (above) the girl ridicules her boyfriend for being a clerk. Ouch! 



The sender of the card above appears to hold postmen in low esteem. I guess she's holding out for a Duke or an Earl.



Don't sell seafood if you want to win the heart of this woman (above)! 


Maybe the seafood guy replied to the fish disdainer with a card like this one (above).


Yikes! Here the Battle of the Cards escalates to the final extreme (above)!  The recipient  is described as a dried-up old spinster who reads silly books all day. Ouch and double Ouch!

I wish I knew how people responded to cards like these. Did they laugh them off or resort to fisticuffs?


Friday, February 11, 2011

EMO VALENTINE CARDS

I can't believe I'm putting up a blog post only hours after I put up the previous one. I only just realized that Valentine's Day is coming up! Good Grief!

I'll post again on Monday morning!























 Above, a poster for last year's Valentine's Ball. It's out of date, but I like the way it looks.


Above, a poster for THIS year's ball!